Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*amanda\s+2\.6\.0\s+planner\s+segfaulting\s+when\s+the\s+estimate\s+for\s+a\s+pending\s+backup\s+is\s+larger\s+than\s+the\s+tape\s+size\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*amanda\s+2\.6\.0\s+planner\s+segfaulting\s+when\s+the\s+estimate\s+for\s+a\s+pending\s+backup\s+is\s+larger\s+than\s+the\s+tape\s+size\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. amanda 2.6.0 planner segfaulting when the estimate for a pending backup is larger than the tape size (score: 1): Author: Telsin <telsin AT onholyground DOT com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:55:39 -0500; I noticed this problem after upgrading to 2.6.0 from 2.5.something. All of a sudden it wouldn't complete a backup run and I was getting messages from cron about the planner segfaulting. I culled some; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-04/msg00118.html (12,321 bytes)
2. Re: amanda 2.6.0 planner segfaulting when the estimate for a pending backup is larger than the tape size (score: 1): Author: Jean-Louis Martineau <martineau AT zmanda DOT com>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:19:39 -0400; Darrell, Thanks for reporting the problem. Can you try the attached patch? Jean-Louis Telsin wrote: I noticed this problem after upgrading to 2.6.0 from 2.5.something. All of a sudden it wouldn't com; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-04/msg00119.html (13,232 bytes)
3. Re: amanda 2.6.0 planner segfaulting when the estimate for a pending backup is larger than the tape size (score: 1): Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:42:40 -0400; I haven't heard boo about it. I'll see if I can replicate it. I'm happy to have more eyes on the code! Dustin -- Storage Software Engineer http://www.zmanda.com; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-04/msg00122.html (11,910 bytes)
4. Re: amanda 2.6.0 planner segfaulting when the estimate for a pending backup is larger than the tape size (score: 1): Author: Telsin <telsin AT onholyground DOT com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:28:21 -0500; Jean-Louis It looks like that did the trick. I'll test a little more and let you know for sure, but it correctly produced a "dumps way to big, must skip incremental dumps" error and ran the rest of t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-04/msg00141.html (13,793 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]