Yes, I am too easy to satisfy. That's because after a weekend of dsmfmt-ing, I'm declaring the thing BROKEN worse than before. I take back those nice things I said last Friday. I'm not using raw LVs
I too, have read the manual, and talked to TSM folk, about RAW vs. filesystem usage. I must say, that because of ease, I have always used raw LV's and never had a problem, and get very good performan
Author: David E Ehresman <deehre01 AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:14:56 -0400
You could just format a bunch of 2G storage pool volumes. You know what size they are and they format a lot faster. Yes, I am too easy to satisfy. That's because after a weekend of dsmfmt-ing, I'm de
Author: Mike Cantrell <Mike_Cantrell AT SAKSINC DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:15:06 -0500
Hello I use raw and TSM mirroring because I was told that idf I had a problem and used OS mirroring TSM did not support that. If I wanted TSM support I would need to do TSM mirroring. So make sure! M
Author: "Hart, Charles" <charles.hart AT MEDTRONIC DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:20:56 -0500
We use Raw LVs with great success and performance as well. Dumb question, but why would you want OS mirroring when you have TSM do the mirroring between two Raw LV's You could just format a bunch of
Author: Zlatko Krastev <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 00:32:18 +0300
the mirroring between two Raw LV's Obviously TSM supports only DB & Log volumes mirroring. The mirroring of the random access volumes should be done by hardware or at OS level. Unless in some of the
Thanks to all for the suggestions. I am using OS mirroring because, as I said originally, this is a data area, not log or database. The doc ("The Advantages of Using Journal File System Files", page