Author: "Camilo A. Marrugo" <camilo AT DIALTONE DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 09:53:39 -0400
Just wondering is anyone out there experiences the same with the library tapes. Here is how a "qu vol <vol#> f=d" looks: tsm: TSM>qu vol A00003 f=d Volume Name: A00003 Storage Pool Name: TAPEDATA Dev
Author: Paul van Dongen <paul AT VANGUARD-IT.COM DOT BR>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:54:35 -0300
The tape is full. It's just taking account of already expired data. Look at "Pct. Reclaimable Space". Paul van Dongen Just wondering is anyone out there experiences the same with the library tapes. H
Hi, your tape has some expired data on it, no longer in use. It was once full, now there are some holes on the data. Once utilisation drops below your reclaim treshold for this storagepool, tsm will
Author: Michelle Wiedeman <michelle.wiedeman AT MULTRIX DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:13:36 +0200
u could set the reclamation threshold of the storagepool to 100% but this could affect ur future scratchpool. Just wondering is anyone out there experiences the same with the library tapes. Here is h
Author: Michelle Wiedeman <michelle.wiedeman AT MULTRIX DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:25:10 +0200
oops....a jitter in my way of thinking...sorry...had too many beers last night..lol Just wondering is anyone out there experiences the same with the library tapes. Here is how a "qu vol <vol#> f=d" l
Author: Justin Bleistein <justin.bleistein AT SUNGARD DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:57:19 -0400
Try running expire inventory see what happens or reclamation if that doesn't work. Then if it's a copy volume delete it then do an absolute backup of the client nodes associated with that volume then