Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ultrium\-LTO\s+tapetype\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Ultrium-LTO tapetype (score: 1)
Author: Benjamin Herbert <herbert AT isis.visi DOT com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:38:05 -0600
Has anybody setup an Exabyte LTO tape drive with amanda? If so how do you determine the "filemark" and "speed" entries in the tapetyep section. Here is what I have so far: define tapetype Ultrium-LTO
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-02/msg00102.html (10,642 bytes)

2. Re: Ultrium-LTO tapetype (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 AT duke DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 07:46:59 -0500 (EST)
You could run tapetype (amtapetype in 2.4.4b1) on it. Make sure that hardware compression is *off* when you do this. Note, also, that your length is probably rather optimistic. I've rarely seen hardw
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-02/msg00115.html (11,444 bytes)

3. Re: Ultrium-LTO tapetype (score: 1)
Author: Jay Lessert <jayl AT accelerant DOT net>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:32:03 -0800
Good advice. FWIW, LTO HW compression *does* seem to be pretty good, though; far better than DLT-4000/7000 and EXB-8500 hardware I've used in the past (no experience with SDLT or AIT). Last time I ra
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-02/msg00139.html (11,784 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu