Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Troubleshooting\s+performance\s+issues\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Troubleshooting\s+performance\s+issues\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Troubleshooting performance issues (score: 1): Author: Etienne Brodeur <ebrodeur AT SERTI DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:44:05 -0500; I have some major performance issues during archive operations. I also have bad performance durning backups, but the backup window is large so they complete without any problems. I can't seem to put; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg00113.html (14,616 bytes)
2. Re: Troubleshooting performance issues (score: 1): Author: Niklas Lundstrom <niklas.lundstrom AT FORENINGSSPARBANKEN DOT SE>; Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:32:58 +0100; Hello Your datatransfer rate seems low. Are you running at 100 mbit and full duplex? Try to ftp a file from the client to the server and check the transfertime, with 100mbit you should get about 10mb; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg00117.html (14,912 bytes)
3. Re: Troubleshooting performance issues (score: 1): Author: Mark Stapleton <stapleto AT BERBEE DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 08:53:08 -0600; Windows and slow throughput--prime candidates for answer 04-11 in the monthly FAQ posted to this list at the first of every month. Look for "monthly TSM FAQ" in the www.adsm.org archives. Pay particu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg00123.html (11,969 bytes)
4. Re: Troubleshooting performance issues (score: 1): Author: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>; Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:20:36 +0200; TSM Reference Manual: "TCPWINDOWSIZE Specifies, in kilobytes, the amount of receive data that can be buffered at one time on a TCP/IP connection. ... 3. A window size larger than the buffer space on; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg00148.html (16,351 bytes)
5. Re: Troubleshooting performance issues (score: 1): Author: Gianluca Mariani1 <gianluca_mariani AT IT.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:35:37 +0100; try also: BufPoolSize 81920 --> set to 10% of RAM UseLargeBuffers Yes --> set to NO MoveBatchSize 256 --> set to 1000 for the rest Zlatko said it all, especially about the tapes. maybe you can run an; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg00149.html (17,984 bytes)
6. Re: Troubleshooting performance issues (score: 1): Author: Michael Kindermann <michael.kindermann AT GMX DOT NET>; Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 13:33:39 +0100; hello, the reason for slow backup or archiving is in my expierience mostly a mismatch in switchport speed. On the other hand i had very backupperformance after there had been a new virusscan engine i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg00150.html (20,864 bytes)
7. Re: Troubleshooting performance issues (score: 1): Author: DFrance <DFrance-TSM AT ATT DOT NET>; Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:10:46 -0600; I like all what you two said; simply turn on the "perform" client trace opt, specify output file, post the results -- it's a small file of output, less than 50 lines -- then we can really discuss the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg00391.html (19,844 bytes)
8. Re: Troubleshooting performance issues (score: 1): Author: "Kelly J. Lipp" <lipp AT STORSOL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:52:01 -0700; This is definitely a problem with duplex in your network adapters. If you are using managed switches, make sure both sides have their adapters set to 100 mb full duplex. Set the switches the same. Ma; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-11/msg01123.html (15,796 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]