Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+next\s+tape\s+Amanda\s+expects\s+to\s+use\s+is\:\s+a\s+new\s+tape\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+next\s+tape\s+Amanda\s+expects\s+to\s+use\s+is\:\s+a\s+new\s+tape\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape (score: 1): Author: John <john AT keimel DOT com>; Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:26:54 -0500; Long story short. Ran tapetype on a 230m tape. Then got a box of 170m tapes without noticing. Tape 4, a 170M tape was snapped at it's end. I amrmtape tape4, and now amanda insists it needs a new tape; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-02/msg00012.html (11,995 bytes)
2. Re: The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape (score: 1): Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 AT duke DOT edu>; Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:07:51 -0500 (EST); Change your tapecycle to match how many tapes you have. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-02/msg00013.html (11,876 bytes)
3. Re: The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape (score: 1): Author: John <john AT keimel DOT com>; Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:22:44 -0500; I still get the same message. I note that tapelist still shows tape Daily04 as 'reuse', even though I amrmtape 'd it. cat tapelist 20030111 Daily04 reuse 20030111 Daily03 reuse 20030110 Daily02 reuse; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-02/msg00014.html (12,354 bytes)
4. Re: The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape (score: 1): Author: Frank Smith <fsmith AT hoovers DOT com>; Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 13:36:07 -0600; ** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [cannot overwrite active tape Daily01]. Some dumps may have been left in the holding disk. Run amflush to flush them to tape. The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-02/msg00015.html (12,522 bytes)
5. Re: The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape (score: 1): Author: Chris Dahn <chris.dahn AT computer DOT org>; Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:05:49 -0500; Provided you changed your amanda.conf so that it is now expecting 7 tapes, you could edit the tapelist file and remove the bad tape from it.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-02/msg00016.html (11,628 bytes)
6. Re: The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape (score: 1): Author: Jason Brooks <jason.brooks AT windriver DOT com>; Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 12:17:26 -0800; Hello, I believe the order of your tapelist dictates to amanda what the next tape should be. the last entry is the next tape. Assuming you have entered a new tape number 4, you might ensure that is t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-02/msg00017.html (14,233 bytes)
7. Re: The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape (score: 1): Author: john AT keimel DOT com (John); Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:06:01 -0500; Thank folks for the helpful tips. I've edited my amanda.conf to read 7 tapes. I've also removed the broken tape 4 out of my tapelist. The trouble is that a cow-orker was making some edits and left so; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-02/msg00124.html (12,464 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]