- 1. Tapes unaccounted for??? (score: 1)
- Author: Farren Minns <fminns AT WILEY.CO DOT UK>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 15:10:39 +0100
- Hi All I recently when to our off-site location where our Copypool DR volumes are housed to make sure that all the tapes I thought should be there actually were. That part of the mission was a succes
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-10/msg00017.html (12,570 bytes)
- 2. Re: Tapes unaccounted for??? (score: 1)
- Author: Sean M English <senglish AT US.IBM DOT COM>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:49:20 -0400
- Farren, I've seen this happen before when the TSM DB tapes get out of sync with DRM. Basically, what we do, is once a quarter we perform an audit. We get a list from the offsite vendor and compare it
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-10/msg00019.html (11,048 bytes)
- 3. Re: Tapes unaccounted for??? (score: 1)
- Author: Farren Minns <fminns AT WILEY.CO DOT UK>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 15:54:59 +0100
- Thanks for that Sean That's kind of what I expected and our DB volumes expire after five days so this should be OK. But I think I will keep a close eye on the DB volume numbers from now on and see if
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-10/msg00021.html (13,837 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu