Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tape\s+volume\s+in\s+wrong\s+storage\s+pool\/devclass\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tape\s+volume\s+in\s+wrong\s+storage\s+pool\/devclass\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Tape volume in wrong storage pool/devclass? (score: 1): Author: Joe Howell <JHowell AT SHELTERINSURANCE DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:31:26 -0600; This is very weird - has anyone else ever seen anything like this? TSM 5.2 on z/OS 1.4, using a 3494 ATL. I was running reclamation on my offsite copy storage pool over the weekend and got a "mount f; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00693.html (12,283 bytes)
2. Re: Tape volume in wrong storage pool/devclass? (score: 1): Author: John Naylor <John.Naylor AT SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO DOT UK>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:40:09 +0000; got Try looking at TSM volhist, z/OS system logs and RMM logs for references to your tape. Might be a good idea to check what RMM thinks are your onsite and offsite tapes with what TSM thinks, to see; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00702.html (12,161 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]