Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tape\s+Copy\s+pools\s+and\s+Colocation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tape\s+Copy\s+pools\s+and\s+Colocation\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Tape Copy pools and Colocation (score: 1): Author: Kyle Sparger <ksparger AT DIALTONEINTERNET DOT NET>; Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:36:34 -0400; Hello, I'm starting to implement tape copy pools. My primary pool has colocation enabled, in order to speed up restores. My primary storage pool currently is using 27 tapes at varying degrees of usag; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-10/msg01239.html (11,581 bytes)
2. Re: Tape Copy pools and Colocation (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:52:31 -0400; It sounds like your COPY pool has colocation enabled. Just turn that off for the copy pool, leave it on for the primary pool.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-10/msg01242.html (10,635 bytes)
3. Re: Tape Copy pools and Colocation (score: 1): Author: Kelly Lipp <lipp AT STORSOL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:04:16 -0700; Don't collocate the copy storage pool. Obviously, each day at least one tape will go out that is not full. No avoiding that. However, if you agressively reclaim the copy storage pool the number of ta; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-10/msg01244.html (11,851 bytes)
4. Re: Tape Copy pools and Colocation (score: 1): Author: Jack McKinney <jackmc-adsm AT LORENTZ DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:08:16 -0500; When you run BACKUP STGPOOL with the PREVIEW=VOL or PREVIEW=YES options, then the tape that it reports are that ones from the primary storage pool that it is going to need to read from, not the ones; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-10/msg01245.html (13,149 bytes)
5. Re: Tape Copy pools and Colocation (score: 1): Author: Gabriel Wiley <wileyg AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:49:41 -0700; Kyle, If you do not have your copypool set to collocate, the copypool tapes will be used more efficiently. Just update your copy stgpool accordingly. Gabriel C. Wiley ADSM/TSM Administrator AIX Suppo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-10/msg01249.html (12,205 bytes)
6. Re: Tape Copy pools and Colocation (score: 1): Author: "Joshua S. Bassi" <jbassi AT IHWY DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 08:14:37 -0700; When you define the copy storage pool, make sure you define it with the collocation parameter set to no. Then the storage pool will use the fewest tapes possible. -- Joshua S. Bassi Joshua S. Bassi I; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-10/msg01251.html (10,924 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]