- 1. TSM and Extended format tapes. (score: 1)
- Author: Tony Sinclair <tsinclai AT REGENCE DOT COM>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:23:40 -0700
- Need some input on the following: How does TSM handles extended length cartridges. Our biggest concern is how does TSM track %full for recycle/reclaim processing? If we decide to use extended length
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-09/msg00379.html (11,264 bytes)
- 2. Re: TSM and Extended format tapes. (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:02:39 -0400
- Nothing special - TSM treats them like any other tape, writing until it finally encounters the end of the tape. Perspective: Tapes are like snowflakes - no two tapes are exactly the same length...an
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-09/msg00394.html (11,320 bytes)
- 3. Re: TSM and Extended format tapes. (score: 1)
- Author: Jeff Bach <jdbach AT WAL-MART DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 15:42:13 -0500
- I agree, Prelabeled taped do NOT make a difference. Make sure if you label your own tapes that you check and make sure the label libvol command is successful. I am using 3590 extended length cartridg
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-09/msg00414.html (12,470 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu