- 1. TSM 4.1 bug??? (score: 1)
- Author: Joseph Dawes <jdawes AT CHUBB DOT COM>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 10:41:20 -0400
- Does anyone have a problem with tsm reporting events inaccurately i.e. saying it failes when it completed and the reverse?? please advise Joe
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg00616.html (10,497 bytes)
- 2. Re: TSM 4.1 bug??? (score: 1)
- Author: Lindsay Morris <lmorris AT SERVERGRAPH DOT COM>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 10:46:09 -0400
- TSM is liable to report a client "command"-type schedule (as opposed to an incremental-backup) as completed, when in fact the command failed dismally, and even returned an error status into the clien
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg00617.html (10,790 bytes)
- 3. Re: TSM 4.1 bug??? (score: 1)
- Author: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <GEOFFREY.L.GILL AT SAIC DOT COM>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 07:55:27 -0700
- I have a client that upgraded an NT server to WIN2K without telling me. That node had ADSM baclient V3.1 on it. My server is AIX 4.3.3 TSM 4.1.2.0, and had begun to show failures of that node in the
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg00619.html (11,838 bytes)
- 4. Re: TSM 4.1 bug??? (score: 1)
- Author: Luke Dahl <ldahl AT JPL.NASA DOT GOV>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 08:33:10 -0700
- I'm receiving the same error messages for all Win2K clients, even though most have only had the 4.1.2.12 client installed. Our server is AIX 4.3.2 and TSM 3.1 right now. Please let me know if you fin
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg00625.html (12,479 bytes)
- 5. Re: TSM 4.1 bug??? (score: 1)
- Author: George Lesho <glesho AT AFCE DOT COM>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 10:59:26 -0500
- I am using 3.7.3.6 on 4.3.2 and get failure messages from the event log at times when the backup/archive actually completed sucessfully. The misreported events are usually in conjunction with a data
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg00626.html (11,104 bytes)
- 6. Re: TSM 4.1 bug??? (score: 1)
- Author: M Jenkins <Mavis.Jenkins AT IPAUSTRALIA.GOV DOT AU>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 15:33:03 +1000
- I have seen this error on 2 of our NT client nodes (V3.7.2) where the server (V3.7.4) reports the event as having failed but investigation of the client's dsmsched.log has shown that the backup worke
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg00645.html (12,933 bytes)
- 7. Re: TSM 4.1 bug??? (score: 1)
- Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 12:48:01 -0400
- It is not uncommon with the 3.7.2 client running on Win2K to misreport events. Most people have reported their problem resolved by installing the 4.1.2.12 client code. Go to www.adsm.org, search the
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg00674.html (10,755 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu