- 1. Storage pool DSNs (score: 1)
- Author: Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT MAIL.TJU DOT EDU>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 09:55:22 -0500
- My site is in the process of installing ADSM under MVS. We plan to have all copy storage pool volumes written on a group of 3590 tape drives. We will probably have volumes for at least some of the pr
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00682.html (11,276 bytes)
- 2. Re: Storage pool DSNs (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 07:13:48 -0800
- Check out the PREFIX parameter of the DEFINE DEVCLASS command. Andy Raibeck IBM Storage Systems Division ADSM Client Development e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com "The only dumb question is the one t
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00684.html (11,479 bytes)
- 3. Re: Storage pool DSNs (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Fletcher <sfletcher AT GIANTOFMARYLAND DOT COM>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 10:13:20 -0500
- Thomas, When you define your sequential storage pools you assign a device class. In order to use the CA-1 TMS/VMS you will need to define two device classes. It is there you control the DSN assigned
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00685.html (12,457 bytes)
- 4. Re: Storage pool DSNs (score: 1)
- Author: Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT MAIL.TJU DOT EDU>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 13:59:57 -0500
- I take it the idea of the above suggestion is to define one device class for volumes to be kept on-site and another device class for volumes to be vaulted. The discussion of the MOUNTLIMIT parameter
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00699.html (11,235 bytes)
- 5. Re: Storage pool DSNs (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 12:43:58 -0800
- Yes, I was getting at creating a second (or as many as you need) device class with a different PREFIX. I accidentally hit the "Send" button before I had a chance to complete the thought (rarely am I
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00708.html (12,667 bytes)
- 6. Re: Storage pool DSNs (score: 1)
- Author: buser andreas <andreas.buser AT BASLER DOT CH>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 09:00:26 -0500
- Hi Andy, we are at ADSM-MVS 3.1.2 and we use the ADSM-prefix for directing tapes to different locations, doing vaulting etc. It works but... We can only define 8 characters as the first prefix we wou
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00797.html (10,861 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu