- 1. Small servers & ejecting tapes (score: 1)
- Author: "Ross, Mitch" <mross AT PSD.COMPUCOM DOT COM>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 15:41:25 -0500
- We started using ADSM here with a 3447 tape library backing up an EMC box, and had great results. The company direction then became to use ADSM at *all* locations in the organization. Good idea, but
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg00418.html (11,515 bytes)
- 2. Re: Small servers & ejecting tapes (score: 1)
- Author: "Eggert, Randall" <REggert AT WIS.TWC DOT COM>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 15:18:14 -0600
- Mitch, had the same situation. The mount retention is after ADSM has used the tape. Thus 9,999 minutes after Monday night's backup, 9,999 minutes after Tuesday's night backup, etc. I think 9999 will
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg00420.html (10,416 bytes)
- 3. Small servers & ejecting tapes (score: 1)
- Author: Ross, Mitch [mailto:mross AT PSD.COMPUCOM DOT COM]
- Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:48:52 -0500
- We started using ADSM here with a 3447 tape library backing up an EMC box, and had great results. The company direction then became to use ADSM at *all* locations in the organization. Good idea, but
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg00421.html (11,526 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu