Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SCSI\s+vs\s+SSA\s+Disk\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SCSI\s+vs\s+SSA\s+Disk\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. SCSI vs SSA Disk (score: 1): Author: Debbie Lane <DLane AT MSSMTP.MSMAILGW.INTERMEC DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 09:19:00 PST; Hi, I am preparing to test ADSM 2.1.0.6 with SQL BackTrack 2.2.1. We are using the IBM "Magstar" 3494 tape library with two 3590 tape heads, which is connected to our ADSM server via fast-wide SCSI.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-10/msg00714.html (11,281 bytes)
2. Re: SCSI vs SSA Disk (score: 1): Author: Benjamin Kokenge <benk AT HSTN.GEOBANK.PGS DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 13:55:30 -0600; . I am not sure if it is released yet, but IBM is suppose to come out with an SSA controller that yields 160MB/sec. This is all find and dandy, but you have to remember that the micro-channel bus on; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-10/msg00717.html (12,533 bytes)
3. Re: SCSI vs SSA Disk (score: 1): Author: Paul Zarnowski <vkm AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 19:29:04 -0500; Deb, It is important to realize that the disk drives used for SCSI and SSA can be the exact same drive. It is the adapter/protocol that is different. SSA performance benefits can be realized when you; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-10/msg00721.html (12,329 bytes)
4. Re[2]: SCSI vs SSA Disk (score: 1): Author: ALLEN BARTH <abarth AT KEMPER DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 09:36:50 -0600; Other SSA things - -hot swappable (dead drives can be replaced without taking down the server) -RAIDable (this needs a different controller card) -RAIDable (this needs a different controller card) -b; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-10/msg00741.html (13,490 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]