- 1. Restores using 3590 (score: 1)
- Author: "Dearman, Richard" <rdearm1 AT UIC DOT EDU>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 15:15:20 -0500
- I'm trying to generate statistics on restoring from a 3494 library using 3590E tape drives. I haven't been able to get a restore rate of more than 1MB/s. Is anyone out there doing restores faster tha
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00038.html (11,033 bytes)
- 2. Re: Restores using 3590 (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 16:33:17 -0400
- Richard - That's very slow. You haven't told us anything about your configuration. If the client is not co-resident with the server, then your network may be the cause of the slow-down. Or perhaps c
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00042.html (11,182 bytes)
- 3. Re: Restores using 3590 (score: 1)
- Author: Mustafa Baytar <mustafa.baytar AT EFESPILSEN.COM DOT TR>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 13:45:13 +0300
- our restore rate for db2 backup from a 3494 library using 3590E over SP switch is 15MB/s , "Dearman, Richard" To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU <rdearm1@UIC. cc: (bcc: MUSTAFA BAYTAR/ATIM/ICECEK) EDU>
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00058.html (11,808 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu