Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*R\:\s+R\:\s+Question\s+about\s+changing\s+Tape\s+Drive\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*R\:\s+R\:\s+Question\s+about\s+changing\s+Tape\s+Drive\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. R: R: Question about changing Tape Drive (score: 1): Author: "Montagni, Giovanni" <gmontagni AT manord DOT com>; Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:29:41 +0200; The thing i can't understand is why the tape created with the new drive works perfectly... Or you're saying that the old drive have never written tape? Tomorrow i will try to read amanda label on few; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-10/msg00008.html (13,736 bytes)
2. Re: R: R: Question about changing Tape Drive (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:06:45 -0400; No, what I'm saying is that the tracking interchange, eg where the tracks are located on the tape, is sufficiently different from the old one that the new one cannot read the old ones tapes, and very; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-10/msg00009.html (15,639 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]