Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Problems\s+with\s+tapecycle\s+$tape\'s\s+Amanda\s+expects\s+to\s+use$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Problems\s+with\s+tapecycle\s+$tape\'s\s+Amanda\s+expects\s+to\s+use$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Problems with tapecycle (tape's Amanda expects to use) (score: 1): Author: Reidar Nordin <reidar AT tedk DOT com>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:51:28 +0200; Hi! Amanda is not asking for the tapes in the same order I labeled the tapes, it seems that Amanda is using tapes randomly... Anyone have a clue??? I have installed amanda-2.4.4 on a RedHat server, i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-04/msg00329.html (12,702 bytes)
2. Re: Problems with tapecycle (tape's Amanda expects to use) (score: 1): Author: James Thorne <j.thorne AT kew DOT org>; Date: 15 Apr 2003 16:08:30 +0100; Amanda is trying to avoid overwriting full backups performed at the start of the previous dumpcycle. Try increasing the number of tapes that you have available (tapecycle) in amanda.conf. The formula; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-04/msg00332.html (12,652 bytes)
3. RE: Problems with tapecycle (tape's Amanda expects to use) (score: 1): Author: "Bort, Paul" <pbort AT tmwsystems DOT com>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:28:03 -0400; Actually, dumpcycle and tapecycle shouldn't be the same. Rather than adding a few spares, you might want to reduce dumpcycle and runspercycle, maybe to 2 weeks and 10 tapes. That way, you have a comp; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-04/msg00338.html (12,292 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]