I am throwing this out the list to get an answer. If you order "pre-labeled" tapes to use with TSM, does this mean that they do not need to go through the "label libv" process? This may seem like a s
Author: Fred Johanson <fred AT MIDWAY.UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:41:20 -0500
We've been ordering "pre-labelled" 3590 carts since we went to the 3494 in ADSM V2. Never had a problem. Quoting Dave Canan <ddcanan AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>: Fred Johanson
I've talked with sites that ordered pre-labeled and got EBCDIC - make sure they specify ANSI ASCII. Bill Smoldt STORServer, Inc. I am throwing this out the list to get an answer. If you order "pre-la
Author: "Bos, Karel" <Karel.Bos AT ATOSORIGIN DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:04:10 +0200
Hi, Maybe a little off topic, but using AUTOlabel is also a fine method of reducing time spent on labeling libvols. Regards, Karel I've talked with sites that ordered pre-labeled and got EBCDIC - mak
In our case, where TSM runs on our MVS (actually Z\OS) instance this is the case. We have never had to go through the label process. I would question whether it would be so if the library was partiti
Author: fred johanson <fred AT MIDWAY.UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:41:07 -0500
In our case, the 3494 is dedicated to *SM running on AIX. I would question whether it would be so if the library was partitioned. We've been ordering "pre-labelled" 3590 carts since we went to the 34
Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:57:40 -0400
TSM writes the same IBM standard internal label as MVS does, even if not running on MVS. But as Bill said, order them ASCII labels. I am throwing this out the list to get an answer. If you order "pre
Author: CORP Rick Willmore <RWillmore AT RSAC DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:07:12 -0700
I have been bitten before by not "labeling" tapes that were ordered prelabeled. ALWAYS LABEL LIBV!~!!! R. TSM writes the same IBM standard internal label as MVS does, even if not running on MVS. But