- 1. Next 2.6.1 issue (score: 1)
- Author: stan <stanb AT panix DOT com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:03:29 -0500
- OK, we moved foward, only to trip over yet another issue. I got far enough to try to run a backup set. Looks like that trigered a problem with taper. amstutus is reporting, in addition to lot's of ot
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-02/msg00104.html (19,138 bytes)
- 2. Re: Next 2.6.1 issue (score: 1)
- Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:34:13 -0500
- (well, two -- one for each child device), then 11s later, fails and goes looking for a new tape. It finds a new tape, but driver says "no soup for you!" 1235054407.366438: taper: getcmd: NO-NEW-TAPE
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-02/msg00114.html (11,516 bytes)
- 3. Re: Next 2.6.1 issue (score: 1)
- Author: stan <stanb AT panix DOT com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:30:43 -0500
- SUCCESS AP0502:/dev/md/dsk/d0 1 0m failed to flush: runtapes volumes already written (15:24:42) I moved the old changer-debug file out fthe way, here is the new one: arguments -> -info Note: setting
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-02/msg00119.html (16,415 bytes)
- 4. Re: Next 2.6.1 issue (score: 1)
- Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:59:51 -0500
- What does amdevcheck DailyDump rait:{file:/vtapes/DailyDump/vtape5,tape:/dev/nst0} give you, now that the perl errors are resolved? Dustin -- Storage Software Engineer http://www.zmanda.com
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-02/msg00120.html (11,332 bytes)
- 5. Re: Next 2.6.1 issue (score: 1)
- Author: stan <stanb AT panix DOT com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:26:27 -0500
- We're still chasing this down. First of all, amanda@amanda:/opt/amanda/sbin$ ./amdevcheck DailyDump "rait:{file:/vtapes/DailyDump/vtape5,tape:/dev/nst0}" SUCCESS And: amcheck DailyDump is happy. But
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-02/msg00124.html (19,945 bytes)
- 6. Re: Next 2.6.1 issue (score: 1)
- Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:45:03 -0500
- It's getting a failure writing to the first tape, and then seeking sequentially for subsequent tapes. It's the initial failure that's problematic. It's occurring in the eight seconds here: (taper wri
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-02/msg00130.html (12,294 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu