Author: Paul Zarnowski <vkm AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 20:45:13 -0400
This is a PTF7 NetWare performance question: Does anyone know if there are any known performance problems running the new 3.1.0.7 Netware client with a server earlier than 3.1.2.30? The PTF7 client a
Author: "Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF." <Rene.Lambelet AT NESTLE DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 12:52:21 +0200
Hello Paul, yes we have a serious performance problem here. We went from 3.1.0.6 to 3.1.0.7 on a Netware client 4.11. Our adsm server is 3.1.2.20 (OS/390). The backup elapsed time for 25000 files ins
Author: Tom Anstey <tom.anstey AT MOLECULAR-MEDICINE.OXFORD.AC DOT UK>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:06:35 +0100
I noticed a similar fall in performance. However this was only for the first run. Subsequent incrementals seem to have improved. Tom == Tom Anstey Computer Manager Institute of Molecular Medicine Joh
Author: Paul Zarnowski <vkm AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 13:06:59 -0400
Last week I posted a question about ADSM performance on the new 3.1.0.7 client. Here is an update on what we have found. After adjusting some tuning options, we were able to get performance back to w
This invokes my mantra: NEVER TAKE DEFAULTS. Always specify what you want, and life will have fewer surprises. It's made my life a lot easier over the past 20 years. Richard Sims, BU
Author: "Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF." <Rene.Lambelet AT NESTLE DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:58:21 +0200
Thanks a lot Paul, the MEMORYEFFICIENTBACKUP NO fixed the performance problem we had with 3.1.0.7. Regards, Rene Lambelet Nestec SA - 55, Av. Nestle - CH-1800 Vevey Tel: ++41'21'924'35'43 / Fax: ++41