Author: Kent Monthei <Kent.J.Monthei AT GSK DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:52:58 -0500
A node has been misdirecting a huge amount of data into our on-site TAPEPOOL because of missing management class bindings in an inclexcl file (several missing 'include <filespace> <management class>'
Kent, Yes that works to the extent that client data is collocated on the tapes. If there is another client's data on that tape, that client's data will move too. Kelly J. Lipp Storage Solutions Speci
Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:46:30 -0500
But that won't get rid of the COPYPOOL copies, will it? Relocating the primary copy of backups from one primary pool to another doesn't affect the copies already in the copy pool. What about this: 1)
Author: Tab Trepagnier <Tab.Trepagnier AT LAITRAM DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:51:15 -0600
Wanda, Yes, that will, with the exception that if archives are retained after the export, they will "lock" the filespace name. I am going through such a evolution right now, and that is what happened
That will do it and do it perfectly. Lots of work though, but Kent has big, fast servers and big, fast tape drives so that probably makes the most sense. Kelly J. Lipp Storage Solutions Specialists,