Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Need\s+a\s+new\s+server\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Need\s+a\s+new\s+server\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Need a new server (score: 1): Author: Todd Mitchell <TMitchell AT WBLTD DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 15:23:08 -0600; We are currently run our ADSM server on a 580 RS/6000 (128M RAM) with two Exabyte 10e tape units. Our equipment has been failing (one of the 10e's is down right now). My question: Can anyone recommen; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-02/msg01229.html (10,774 bytes)
2. Re: Need a new server (score: 1): Author: Eric LEWIS <eric.lewis AT CCMAIL.ADP.WISC DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 18:23:38 -0600; There is no such thing as a good 8mm tape solution for computer use. Helical scan tape was never intended for digital data. Save yourself some money and purchase tape equipment intended for digital d; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-02/msg01245.html (11,644 bytes)
3. Re: Need a new server (score: 1): Author: Robert Cross <Robert.Cross AT SCOTTISH-NEWCASTLE.CO DOT UK>; Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 10:16:46 +0000; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-02/msg01258.html (10,163 bytes)
4. Re: Need a new server (score: 1): Author: Shane <shanesmith AT WESTPAC.COM DOT AU>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 07:53:38 +1000; Hi, We use NT servers for our ADSM system. We need a bigger tape subsystem, but the servers are adequate to the task. We found that a large uni-processor box is just as good as a multi-processor box; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-02/msg01301.html (11,321 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]