Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NTUSER\.DAT\/LOG\s+getting\s+failed\s+during\s+backup\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NTUSER\.DAT\/LOG\s+getting\s+failed\s+during\s+backup\!\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. NTUSER.DAT/LOG getting failed during backup! (score: 1): Author: "Chandrashekar, C. R. (Chandrasekhar)" <cr.chandrashekar AT TIMKEN DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:06:39 +0530; Hi TSMers, During scheduled backup few TSM clients are getting failed to take backup of NTUSER.DAT/LOG files with return code 12, How can I avoid this, Please kindly share your thoughts. TSM server 5; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-01/msg00422.html (12,914 bytes)
2. Re: NTUSER.DAT/LOG getting failed during backup! (score: 1): Author: Imre Kloknicer <ikloknicer AT EU.INFOBAL DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:50:10 +0100; Hi, These files belong to the user profile of the SAPServiceBS user that is a Windows user account used by a service currently running on your nodes. I don't think that it is necessary to backup thes; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-01/msg00423.html (14,265 bytes)
3. Re: NTUSER.DAT/LOG getting failed during backup! (score: 1): Author: "Troy L. Minter" <tminter AT SPARKS DOT ORG>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:51:03 -0600; I had this problem and have had to set max mount points to 999. Hi TSMers, During scheduled backup few TSM clients are getting failed to take backup of NTUSER.DAT/LOG files with return code 12, How c; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-01/msg00429.html (13,229 bytes)
4. Re: NTUSER.DAT/LOG getting failed during backup! (score: 1): Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:06:31 -0700; ANE4987E has been treated as RC 4 since the "consistent return codes" feature was introduced in version 5.1. Check the client dsmsched.log and dsmerror.log files for other error messages that might b; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-01/msg00434.html (14,204 bytes)
5. Re: NTUSER.DAT/LOG getting failed during backup! (score: 1): Author: Svetoslav Tolev <Bugs AT BULMAG DOT BG>; Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:41:10 +0000; The error Message is correct. The problem is that the file USER.DAT is part of Registry (HKEY_CURRENT_USER). when you start the client via user (not as a service) then you will recive this message. I; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-01/msg00446.html (15,056 bytes)
6. Re: NTUSER.DAT/LOG getting failed during backup! (score: 1): Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:58:33 -0700; The message may be correct, but I am more concerned about the RC 12. There is some other problem going on besides ANE4987E, because ANE4987E by itself should not cause RC 12. Regards, Andy Andy Raibe; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-01/msg00462.html (15,918 bytes)
7. Re: NTUSER.DAT/LOG getting failed during backup! (score: 1): Author: "Chandrashekar, C. R. (Chandrasekhar)" <cr.chandrashekar AT TIMKEN DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:54:41 +0530; Andy and Others, TSM server 5.1.7.0 on AIX. TSM client 5.2.0.1 W2k. I'm really finding a strange behavior on scheduled status one of the TSM client was getting backed up successfully and suddenly sta; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-01/msg00486.html (22,092 bytes)
8. Re: NTUSER.DAT/LOG getting failed during backup! (score: 1): Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:35:21 -0700; I can see from the dsmsched.log extracts that the backup on 1/15 ran OK, but the one on 1/16 did not. However, it is not possible to identify the problem since (a) you did not provide complete dsmsch; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-01/msg00513.html (23,305 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]