Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NT\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NT\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. NT? (score: 1): Author: jonwa AT SLAC.STANFORD DOT EDU; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1993 12:31:16 -0800; Is there a version of either WDSF or ADSM for NT?; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1993-12/msg00004.html (9,933 bytes)
2. Re: NT? (score: 1): Author: "Robert G. Moskowitz" <0003858921 AT MCIMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1993 07:01:00 EST; I read the product glossy to say that WinSock 1.1 is supported for the Windows client. ERGO: NT is supported via the 16 bit Windows Client right now. Bob; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1993-12/msg00005.html (10,131 bytes)
3. Re: NT? (score: 1): Author: jonwa AT SLAC.STANFORD DOT EDU; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1993 10:42:28 -0800; I would suppose that means ADSM and not wdsf, correct? Unless there is a winsock version of WDSF that no-one told me about. Also, I rather expect some file system complications with a drive formatte; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1993-12/msg00008.html (10,681 bytes)
4. Re: NT? (score: 1): Author: "Robert G. Moskowitz" <0003858921 AT MCIMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1993 16:28:00 EST; Yes, ADSM. Should be no problem with NTFS **provided**: No Long names, those will get converted to 8.3 names. No extended attributes. Or so I would assume based on the way other Windows apps work on; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1993-12/msg00011.html (10,539 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]