Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NETVIEW\s+vs\s+TEC\s+for\s+Correlation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NETVIEW\s+vs\s+TEC\s+for\s+Correlation\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. NETVIEW vs TEC for Correlation (score: 1): Author: Don Seitz <don_seitz AT INS DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 16:04:36 -0500; I've seen this before but can't find it now. How many events(traps) can Netview handle vs the TEC? I thought Netview was around 6000 per minute and the TEC was like 100 per minute... I am making reco; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-07/msg00385.html (10,825 bytes)
2. Re: NETVIEW vs TEC for Correlation (score: 1): Author: Ray Schafer <schafer AT TKG DOT COM>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 07:02:29 +0000; I will try. You are correct. When you are doing correlation, TEC is slower. Howver there are advantages to using TEC. For one thing, the Netview daemon that does correlation does so by keeping events; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-07/msg00387.html (13,455 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]