Author: "Sanders, David" <DSanders AT INTERNAL.MASSMUTUAL DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 07:10:11 -0500
We currently have our server running on a MVS mainframe, and I want to move it to another mainframe. In anticipation of that, I had requested all of the client administrators to change their options
Author: Daniel Thompson <thompsod AT USAA DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 08:14:33 -0600
David, Somebody is selling you a bill of goods. We have all of our clients point to a specific MVS server by using a TCP/IP alias (or cname in DNS-speak). If one of our MVS LPARs goes down we have th
The only place we had problems was with NetWare - the native NetWare TCP/IP code does not support DNS, and so all of those folks have to direct address - we don't support the third party name resolut
Author: Jim Kleberg <jrkleberg AT STATESTREET DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 09:54:41 -0500
We have 2 TCP/IP stacks dedicated to ADSM on an MVS image accessed by open systems through a CISCO CIP ESCON connection. We have backup CLAW statements in the router pointing to subchannel addresses
Author: Trevor Foley <Trevor.Foley AT BANKERSTRUST.COM DOT AU>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 09:36:09 +1100
G'day, I'm not sure why you have been told that this is not do-able; that is exactly how we run here. None of our clients use the 'physical' tcp address for the server. If it makes any difference, ou