Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LTO\s+to\s+LTO2\s+\-\s+restore\s+times\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LTO\s+to\s+LTO2\s+\-\s+restore\s+times\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LTO to LTO2 - restore times (score: 1): Author: i love tsm <ilovetsm AT HOTMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:48:05 +0100; All Just wondered if anyone has upgraded from LTO to LTO2, and what difference this made if any, to restore times and stgpool backup times. Regards ___________________________________________________; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00433.html (10,590 bytes)
2. Re: LTO to LTO2 - restore times (score: 1): Author: Zlatko Krastev <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>; Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:10:15 +0300; The most favorite answer in the industry - it depends! In theory you should get up to 33% performance boost: LTO1 drives have native speed of 15 MB/s, while LTO2 drive accessing LTO1 media should giv; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00435.html (12,256 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]