Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*JR\-\s+Client\s+Option\s+set\s+vs\s+dsm\.opt\s+$sys$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*JR\-\s+Client\s+Option\s+set\s+vs\s+dsm\.opt\s+$sys$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. JR- Client Option set vs dsm.opt (sys) (score: 1): Author: JR Trimark <j.r.trimark AT AURORA DOT ORG>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:38:19 -0600; We are debating whether or not to use client option sets in addition to the dsm.opt file. A little history is needed for discussion sake: We are backing up data only, which is typically on another dr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-03/msg00287.html (11,088 bytes)
2. Re: JR- Client Option set vs dsm.opt (sys) (score: 1): Author: Daniel Sparrman <Daniel.Sparrman AT EXIST DOT SE>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:42:45 +0100; Using only thoose options would make the difference between using client optionsets and dsm.opt entries fairly small due to the fact all of thoose options are static ones. I always use client options; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-03/msg00288.html (12,362 bytes)
3. Re: JR- Client Option set vs dsm.opt (sys) (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:43:51 -0500; If it's easy for you to log in and set up the dsm.opt files for your servers, that's fine. In the case of someone whose clients are geographically scattered, and/or they don't have administration rig; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-03/msg00297.html (12,216 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]