Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Drives\s+for\s+ATL\s+DLT\s+libraries\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Drives\s+for\s+ATL\s+DLT\s+libraries\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Drives for ATL DLT libraries? (score: 1): Author: Martin Wendel <Martin.Wendel AT ITS.UU DOT SE>; Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 11:12:31 +0100; Does ADSM v2r1 support ATL DLT libraries with DLT4000 drives? We need to increase our capacity and have been looking at ATL 2/28 and 2/52 to replace our Quantum 4700s. Looking at the README for the l; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1996-12/msg00003.html (10,561 bytes)
2. Re: Drives for ATL DLT libraries? (score: 1): Author: Steven Bridge <ccaasub AT UCL.AC DOT UK>; Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 17:34:45 +0000; I'm pleased you raised this question as we are planning on buying a DLT tape library and the ATL 2/28 and 2/52 were leading contenders for us. I had assumed that the DLT4000 drives were supported fo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1996-12/msg00033.html (11,693 bytes)
3. Re: Drives for ATL DLT libraries? (score: 1): Author: Martin Wendel <Martin.Wendel AT ITS.UU DOT SE>; Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 10:25:44 +0100; I've got three answers from people using ADSM with DLT4000 drives in ATL libraries, two with 4/52 and one with 6/176 (none with 2/52). All = three are pleased and has no problems with it. I've got n; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1996-12/msg00051.html (12,338 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]