Author: "Richard L. Rhodes" <rhodesr AT WATT.OEDISON DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 1997 02:56:34 -0500
We are evaluating ADSM, it hasn't been pretty :-(. Our eval system is a RS6/k-590 with 512MB, as much disk as I need to put on it, a DLT drive, and a Qualstar 46120 8mm tape lib (4 8505XL drives). It
Author: Eric LEWIS <Eric.Lewis AT CCMAIL.ADP.WISC DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 14:29:04 CDT
3) Is anyone familiar with what changes are planed for ADSM to allow it to handle small files better? Response: I understand that IBM is working to reduce the database overhead for small files using
Author: "Pittson, Timothy ,HiServ/US" <tpittson AT HIMAIL.HCC DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 22:34:56 -0400
Richard, 1) The ADSM 2.1.5.x code on SMP systems had problems early on but is improving of late. It does scale past 1 processor - we've got 2 processors on an R30 and can keep them pretty busy at nig
Author: "Dwight E. Cook" <decook AT AMOCO DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 1997 08:09:19 -0500
Item Subject: 1.txt "internet headers" Could not convert BINARY FILE item to text. Will attempt to 'shar' item as file '028876h' at end of msg. .......................................................