Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Does\s+\"Attached\s+Changer\"\s+matter\s+in\s+mtx\s+inquiry\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Does\s+\"Attached\s+Changer\"\s+matter\s+in\s+mtx\s+inquiry\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Does "Attached Changer" matter in mtx inquiry? (score: 1): Author: Marcus <ashogunnamedmarcus AT yahoo DOT com>; Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:29:03 -0700 (PDT); Here's what I get marcb@blt:~> sudo /usr/sbin/mtx -f /dev/sg0 inquiry Product Type: Tape Drive Vendor ID: 'QUANTUM ' Product ID: 'DLT8000 ' Revision: '0232' Attached Changer: No marcb@blt:~> sudo /us; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-08/msg00084.html (11,269 bytes)
2. Re: Does "Attached Changer" matter in mtx inquiry? (score: 1): Author: Michael Loftis <mloftis AT wgops DOT com>; Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:00:00 -0600; No. Attached Changer in this context I believe means SCSI attachment...something very different from physical attachment. In any case I've only seen one changer that reported as attached. And IIRC it; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-08/msg00087.html (11,245 bytes)
3. Re: Does "Attached Changer" matter in mtx inquiry? (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 20:41:58 -0400; I don't believe so. I think, but could be wrong, that when mtx reports an attached changer, it may be at other than the base LUN=0. If the devices are seperated by their device address on the scsi bu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-08/msg00089.html (12,183 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]