Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Disk\s+pool\s+size\s+vs\s+large\s+file\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: Sam Schrage <sam.schrage AT TRW DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:14:48 -0500
I have a 56GB disk pool with the next pool to tape. I have a user, DB2 Admin, that wants to back up a 125GB DB2 backup. What's the best way to handle this one user? If he/she backs up the file will i
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00759.html (11,376 bytes)

2. Re: Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:00:54 -0400
That huge backup will likely choke on the disk pool filling and waiting for migration to tape. I would take the approach, for this one exceptional backup event, of doing UPDate STGpool ... ACCess=RE
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00763.html (11,991 bytes)

3. Re: Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: Chris Gibes <gibes AT BERBEE DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:19:07 -0500
A couple of questions first. What kind and how many tape drives are you migrating to? What kind of disk are you using and how is it attached? I have a seen a few sites with SSA disk pools and multipl
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00765.html (12,748 bytes)

4. Re: Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:22:21 -0400
What we do is to put the one BIG Oracle TDP client we have into a separate domain for BIG users with a management class that points direct to tape, instead of the disk pool. Just remember that whenev
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00767.html (11,778 bytes)

5. Re: Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: Joe Cascanette <Joe.Cascanette AT CUMIS DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:37:29 -0400
My experience with hugh files that exceed the backuppool is adjusting the high and low thresholds to a high=85 and a low=70. So far the tape migration will start when the 85% of the storage is used a
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00771.html (12,010 bytes)

6. Re: Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: Sam Schrage <sam.schrage AT TRW DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:49:58 -0500
Chris, I guess I could have described the problem a little better. What I have is SSA disks backed up by a 3583 LTO library w/6 drives? And this works very well. It's when I get this DB2 backup once
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00772.html (14,046 bytes)

7. Re: Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: Bradley Tidd <bhtidd AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:39:05 -0600
What I did for my large DB2 customers was make a class which is bound to go directly to a tape pool. You could even do it for just that one dataset, if they bind it in their IE file (if using an API
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00775.html (12,857 bytes)

8. Re: Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: Indra Gunawan <igunone AT YAHOO DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:50:12 -0700
Sam, actually storage pool has MAXSIZE THRESHOLD parameter, it will limit the files that can be placed in that storage pool up to the value assigned in MAXSIZE. If a file is too large for the first s
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00780.html (15,982 bytes)

9. Re: Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: Hrouda Tomá <Hrouda AT AGCOM DOT CZ>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:19:10 +0200
Yes, you are completely right ... files grater than available space in diskpool are currently writed to tapepool ... no data will be lost and no backup crash wouldn't occure. You can even set up the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00781.html (12,872 bytes)

10. Re: Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: "Lee, Lin-Yen" <LLee AT SCJ DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:42:00 -0500
How to have a MC directly points to tape?
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00815.html (11,572 bytes)

11. Re: Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: "France, Don G (Pace)" <don.france-eds AT EDS DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:17:11 -0400
Inspect your server activity log; there's probably better info, there -- like a tape mount request that didn't get satisfied within the "mount like a tape mount request that didn't get satisfied with
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00833.html (12,716 bytes)

12. Re: Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Bach <jdbach AT WAL-MART DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:26:51 -0500
Stefan, How can I find out it this will effect me when converting using Informix and Exchange servers on AIX 4.1.3? ADSM SUPPORT PEOPLE, How do we find out about all of these "FEATURES" of design tha
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg00854.html (16,904 bytes)

13. Re: Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: Mark Stapleton <stapleto AT BERBEE DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 13:14:31 -0500
I had to laugh when I read the above statement. I suddenly summoned this mental image of a Tivoli level 2 support engineer reading it, leaning over his cubicle wall to his neighbor, and asking, "Say,
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg01076.html (12,372 bytes)

14. Re: Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:35:42 -0400
Amen, Mark. It's dismaying to see, like, a one-sentence response to an issue which includes the entire thread of a discussion along with it, running for hundreds of lines. If you've visited www.adsm
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg01079.html (11,928 bytes)

15. Re: Disk pool size vs large file (score: 1)
Author: Lisa Cabanas <CABANL AT MAIL.MODOT.STATE.MO DOT US>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:36:44 -0500
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-06/msg01080.html (11,189 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu