Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Disk\s+Storage\s+Volume\s+Pool\s+Sizing\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Disk Storage Volume Pool Sizing (score: 1)
Author: Mitch Sako <msako AT CADENCE DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:54:21 -0700
Simple Question: In a disk storage pool which migrates to LTO tape, what is the optimal size for the volumes to be? Let's assume the following: Fast network connection(s) 1-to-many clients (depending
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-08/msg00683.html (11,063 bytes)

2. Re: Disk Storage Volume Pool Sizing (score: 1)
Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:26:58 -0400
1. IT DEPENDS. (You KNEW I was going to say that, didn't you?!?) 2. There is no "right" answer (so you will probably be getting LOTS of opinions back about this question ;>). 3. If you only have a fe
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-08/msg00731.html (14,136 bytes)

3. Re: Disk Storage Volume Pool Sizing (score: 1)
Author: Mitch Sako <msako AT CADENCE DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 09:29:08 -0700
Yes. Understood. That's me, however, I was thinking in terms of tuning my repository for quickest throughput. Understood, however I go back to my size tuning question, more smaller or less bigger? Bu
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-08/msg00744.html (14,822 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu