- 1. DIRMC stgpool: DISK or FILE? (score: 1)
- Author: Jurjen Oskam <jurjen-tsm AT STUPENDOUS DOT ORG>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:28:12 +0100
- Hi there, I have a question about which devclass to use for a storagepool that is exclusively used as DIRMC destination. The server originally was set up with a large enough DIRPOOL of type DISK. Lat
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00308.html (11,615 bytes)
- 2. Re: DIRMC stgpool: DISK or FILE? (score: 1)
- Author: "Stapleton, Mark" <mark.stapleton AT BERBEE DOT COM>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 14:02:08 -0600
- Storage pools that act as DIRMC management class destinations never grow to any size to speak of, and they contain redundant data; the normal client data destination pool also contains a copy of all
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00368.html (12,344 bytes)
- 3. Re: DIRMC stgpool: DISK or FILE? (score: 1)
- Author: Jurjen Oskam <jurjen-tsm AT STUPENDOUS DOT ORG>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:11:22 +0100
- I wasn't aware of this. Is this documented somewhere? If this is the case, then why have a DIRMC stgpool at all? From ADSM.QuickFacts I've understood that in current TSM versions the restore process
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00376.html (12,077 bytes)
- 4. Re: DIRMC stgpool: DISK or FILE? (score: 1)
- Author: "Rushforth, Tim" <TRushforth AT WINNIPEG DOT CA>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:51:55 -0600
- There was a problem at one time with offsite reclamation running slow when reading from disk (this was fixed a couple of years ago). If you had a DIRPOOL of type DISK only you would have suffered a
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00394.html (13,073 bytes)
- 5. Re: DIRMC stgpool: DISK or FILE? (score: 1)
- Author: Jurjen Oskam <jurjen-tsm AT STUPENDOUS DOT ORG>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:43:39 +0059
- I asked this here, because IBM support asked why we were using FILE volumes instead of DISK volumes for our DIRMC stgpool. He recommends DISK volumes, but only mentioned performance as a reason for t
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00407.html (11,635 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu