- 1. Control-M scheduling (score: 1)
- Author: Barry Kadleck <barry_kadleck AT UK.IBM DOT COM>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 08:59:03 +0000
- Is anyone using Control-M to schedule ADSM and if so, are there any limitations please?
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-03/msg00539.html (10,194 bytes)
- 2. Re: Control-M scheduling (score: 1)
- Author: Victor Au <Victor.Au AT COLESMYER.COM DOT AU>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 09:34:00 +1100
- Barry, We will also be using Control-M to schedule ADSM. I will be building this in the next couple of months. If you receive any information on limitation, etc., I appreciate if you could share that
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-03/msg00552.html (11,041 bytes)
- 3. Re: Control-M scheduling (score: 1)
- Author: Daniel Thompson <thompsod AT USAA DOT COM>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 07:40:54 -0600
- Barry, We are currently implementing NT backups using the Control-M agent. There are several things that need to be considered, such as the ID that will submit the backups. The one thing that I heart
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-03/msg00564.html (10,959 bytes)
- 4. Control-M scheduling (score: 1)
- Author: Barry Kadleck <barry_kadleck AT UK.IBM DOT COM>
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 21:59:00 -0500
- Is anyone using Control-M to schedule ADSM and if so, are there any limitations please? -- ==
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-03/msg00565.html (10,456 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu