Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Another\s+\"dump\s+bigger\s+then\s+tape\"\s+question\"\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Another "dump bigger then tape" question" (score: 1)
Author: Peter Mueller <peter.mueller.ls AT elimpex DOT com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 16:02:46 +0200
Hi! I know this matter has been discussed here serveral times before, but scanning the archive and reading the online docs I could not find answers to my specific problem. My situation: Due to non-op
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-04/msg00330.html (13,129 bytes)

2. Re: Another "dump bigger then tape" question" (score: 1)
Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:06:15 -0400
A 12.1GB dump with a stated tape capacity of 11.7GB. Not a large difference. The pre-dump estimates are just that, estimates. Plus the capacity is not an 'absolute' number. Now, if the estimate had b
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-04/msg00331.html (17,471 bytes)

3. Re: Another "dump bigger then tape" question" (score: 1)
Author: Peter Mueller <peter.mueller.ls AT elimpex DOT com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:44:49 +0200
Hi! Thanks to Jon for the quick answer. Ok. It IS TOO BIG, but now my questions: .) Why did this dump even got created ? A 12.1GB dump with a stated tape capacity of 11.7GB. Not a large difference. T
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-04/msg00332.html (17,852 bytes)

4. Re: Another "dump bigger then tape" question" (score: 1)
Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 17:00:24 -0400
OK, suppose you were one using HW compression. You have to approximate the capacity of the tape by guessing how much your data will be compressed by the tape drive's compressor. So maybe you 'guess'
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-04/msg00334.html (14,929 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu