Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Alleged\s+LTO\s+fragility\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Alleged\s+LTO\s+fragility\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Alleged LTO fragility (score: 1): Author: Tab Trepagnier <Tab.Trepagnier AT LAITRAM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:51:15 -0600; This is a tape media question. We are considering moving from DLT8000 to LTO-1 for offsite tape storage. Our local IBM guys told us that LTO tapes should not be dropped more than 1/2 inch or they ris; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-02/msg00226.html (11,147 bytes)
2. Re: Alleged LTO fragility (score: 1): Author: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>; Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:39:05 -0500; I don't quite think an inch, but... 1. Why LTO-1? LTO3 is current vdersion. 2. The cases are somewhat fragile on older LTO1 tapes. I think originally the two plastic halves were not "welded" together; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-02/msg00227.html (13,218 bytes)
3. Re: Alleged LTO fragility (score: 1): Author: Aaron Durkee <ADurkee AT CHSBUFFALO DOT ORG>; Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:02:52 -0500; We have had a small amount of problems with lto to from handling. An occasional bad tape. Operations on both sides weren't too bad, but the couriers were brutal. I don't think I have the link any mor; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-02/msg00228.html (14,889 bytes)
4. Re: Alleged LTO fragility (score: 1): Author: Tab Trepagnier <Tab.Trepagnier AT LAITRAM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:33:18 -0600; David, We currently have a Gen-1 3583 that would become our "offsite" library. Its online duties would be taken over by a Gen-3 3583. We like having two different libraries for online/offsite. Becaus; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-02/msg00229.html (14,831 bytes)
5. Re: Alleged LTO fragility (score: 1): Author: "Kauffman, Tom" <KauffmanT AT NIBCO DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:40:35 -0500; We did LTO-1 for three years and are now 18 months into mixed LTO-1 and LTO-2. I've got two tapes that have been damaged by dropping - both about 4 feet. As mentioned in one of the other notes, the c; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-02/msg00230.html (12,915 bytes)
6. Re: Alleged LTO fragility (score: 1): Author: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>; Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:41:16 -0500; I thnik if you used the plastic cases (the Jewel cases) for the LTO tapes, should be no problem. David Longo David, We currently have a Gen-1 3583 that would become our "offsite" library. Its online; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-02/msg00231.html (15,959 bytes)
7. Re: Alleged LTO fragility (score: 1): Author: Robin Sharpe <Robin_Sharpe AT BERLEX DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:23:15 -0500; I don't know about LTO1, we have LTO2. They are fragile, but we have not had problems as others have described... I have dropped a few myself, and I can testify that a drop from as little as a foot c; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2006-02/msg00245.html (12,831 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]