Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ANYONE\s+ELSE\s+TRY\s+USIG\s+SUBFILES\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ANYONE\s+ELSE\s+TRY\s+USIG\s+SUBFILES\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. ANYONE ELSE TRY USIG SUBFILES? (score: 1): Author: "MC Matt Cooper (2838)" <Matt.Cooper AT AMGREETINGS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 12:31:52 -0400; Hello All, We are testing out the use of SUBFILE processing. We have a user group that would have to do dial-in backups or we buy them zip drives. Using SUBFILE processing, a very narrow include/excl; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg01294.html (10,959 bytes)
2. Re: ANYONE ELSE TRY USIG SUBFILES? (score: 1): Author: Robert Clark <res03db2 AT GTE DOT NET>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 09:42:15 -0700; 5K bytes/sec is good for 56k under good circumstances isn't it? With lossage due to a less than optimal PPP implementation, 2k doesn't sound all that unusual. (To me anyway.) Is at least one of the e; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg01295.html (11,460 bytes)
3. Re: ANYONE ELSE TRY USIG SUBFILES? (score: 1): Author: "MC Matt Cooper (2838)" <Matt.Cooper AT AMGREETINGS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 13:02:14 -0400; Yes, I was told the receive side is digital. Matt 5K bytes/sec is good for 56k under good circumstances isn't it? With lossage due to a less than optimal PPP implementation, 2k doesn't sound all that; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg01298.html (11,758 bytes)
4. Re: ANYONE ELSE TRY USIG SUBFILES? (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 13:49:11 -0400; Matt - Two points on this issue... 1. There's no such thing as a 56kbs dialup line, which is to say that the phone company does not (refuses to) guarantee voice lines for data, and certainly no guar; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-05/msg01302.html (13,415 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]