Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ADSM\s+system\s+scaling\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. ADSM system scaling (score: 1)
Author: "Patten, Stacy H." <shpatten AT SAINTFRANCIS DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 09:18:22 -0600
Having never scaled an ADSM setup I would appreciate input for our situation: Current Hardware: 1 - H50 -512MB / 1-300MHz 24GB disk pool 1 - 3494 Library w/ 3 3590 drives 1 - ATM NIC (emulating token
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00714.html (11,682 bytes)

2. Re: ADSM system scaling (score: 1)
Author: Steven Thornhill <steve_thornhill AT UK.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:44:38 +0000
Personal opinion is to double up on the number of ADSM servers. Split the tape drives across two machines will increase the data throughput. Also this will give you a little more resiliance. Steve Th
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00715.html (12,285 bytes)

3. Re: ADSM system scaling (score: 1)
Author: "Cook, Dwight E" <cookde AT BP DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 10:57:36 -0500
OK, I've got 12 adsm servers across 4 locations in 3 states... mainly S70's... 3 R40's still and 1 591 (or 59H ? I can't remember) FIRST of all... force client compression... if they don't have the h
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00716.html (14,454 bytes)

4. Re: ADSM system scaling (score: 1)
Author: Nathan King <nathan.king AT USAA DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 10:13:44 -0600
If you really expect 542Gb of incremental data per night then your diskpool should ideally be at least equal to this amount of data. This should stop migration from kicking in and help your performan
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00717.html (13,755 bytes)

5. Re: ADSM system scaling (score: 1)
Author: Mahesh Tailor <MTailor AT CARILION DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 11:10:16 -0500
My two cents worth . . . 1) You state that your clients are connected via 100BT or TR. Are the clients and server in the same physical location? Or are they at locations that are ATM attached to the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00718.html (13,600 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu