Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*A\s+script\s+to\s+test\s+GNU\s+tar\s+exclude\s+patterns\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*A\s+script\s+to\s+test\s+GNU\s+tar\s+exclude\s+patterns\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. A script to test GNU tar exclude patterns (score: 1): Author: Olivier Nicole <on AT cs.ait.ac DOT th>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:23:49 +0700 (ICT); Hi, I have put together the following srcipt http://www.cs.ait.ac.th/~on/testgtar to help testing exclude patterns in GNU tar. This is a simple Perl script, that should run on any installation; but I; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00279.html (12,667 bytes)
2. Re: A script to test GNU tar exclude patterns (score: 1): Author: Frank Smith <fsmith AT hoovers DOT com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:20:25 -0500; I haven't had a chance to test the script yet, but since I ran across this thread about changes in GNU tar from the Debian developers list <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/06/msg01108.html>; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00287.html (12,343 bytes)
3. Re: A script to test GNU tar exclude patterns (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:35:30 -0400; tar-1.19? What happened to 1.16 thru 1.18? Its normally about 3 years per whole point increment... -- Cheers, Gene People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word 'online' betw; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00290.html (12,827 bytes)
4. Re: A script to test GNU tar exclude patterns (score: 1): Author: Frank Smith <fsmith AT hoovers DOT com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:21:55 -0500; Not sure what I was thinking while I was typing, that should be tar 1.15.91 Frank -- Frank Smith fsmith AT hoovers DOT com Sr. Systems Administrator Voice: 512-374-4673 Hoover's Online Fax: 512-374-4; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00294.html (12,992 bytes)
5. Re: A script to test GNU tar exclude patterns (score: 1): Author: Olivier Nicole <on AT cs.ait.ac DOT th>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:14:39 +0700 (ICT); Reading the changelog for GNU tar 1.15.91 is even more frightening, it does not affect only the exclude file, but it does affect the extract command: tar xf foo.tar *.c now means to extract the file; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00315.html (12,227 bytes)
6. Re: A script to test GNU tar exclude patterns (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:35:08 -0400; Yikes! I assume thats been filed as a bug? If not, why not? No guessing about it Olivier. I sometimes wonder why, when a utility such as tar, which can be said to be a mature utility now after what,; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00316.html (13,426 bytes)
7. Re: A script to test GNU tar exclude patterns (score: 1): Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 01:07:18 -0400; Badly ;( However, if I read correctly the old behavior can be restored with the option "--wildcards". Probably the configure script will have to test for version > 1.15.90 and if present add the opti; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00317.html (12,889 bytes)
8. Re: A script to test GNU tar exclude patterns (score: 1): Author: Olivier Nicole <on AT cs.ait.ac DOT th>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:34:34 +0700 (ICT); New version of Amanda will take care of that, I am thinking about existing Amanda installation where tar 1.15.91 is suddnely pushed in. Olivier; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-07/msg00318.html (11,853 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]