Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*4\.2\.0\s+client\s+backup\s+performance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*4\.2\.0\s+client\s+backup\s+performance\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. 4.2.0 client backup performance (score: 1): Author: Gianni Garda <gianni.garda AT LABINF DOT IT>; Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:19:27 +0100; Hi all, My scenario Running a TSM Server 4.2.0 on Win2000 with 3583 Library My problems is with performances backups of Win2000 Client (4.2.0). If the copy destination in backup copy groups is set to; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-10/msg01425.html (10,646 bytes)
2. Re: 4.2.0 client backup performance (score: 1): Author: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>; Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 23:34:20 +0200; 3583 (and other LTO libs) is a "Speedy Gonsales" library in the Wintel world. Only Magstar 3590-E1A drives are faster. I would bet that your network is not so fast and direct-to-tape backup writes in; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-10/msg01467.html (12,044 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]