Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3590\s+Tape\s+Drives\s+more\s+questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3590\s+Tape\s+Drives\s+more\s+questions\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. 3590 Tape Drives more questions (score: 1): Author: "David Browne." <dbrowne AT HUMANA DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 13:37:50 -0500; Thanks. I have a couple more questions. 1. Why do I need to specify a different ADSM prefix in the new device class? 2. When we change our primary tape storage pool from devclass=CARTRIDGE (which use; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-03/msg01584.html (10,510 bytes)
2. Re: 3590 Tape Drives more questions (score: 1): Author: John Naylor <John.Naylor AT SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO DOT UK>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:53:34 +0100; David, I was thinking of my own conversion which we have done on a phased basis. Initially moving only our large servers over to the new tape technology. We therefore continued to write 3490, which i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-03/msg01630.html (12,258 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]