Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3590\s+Fibre\s+Channel\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3590\s+Fibre\s+Channel\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. 3590 Fibre Channel (score: 1): Author: "David M. Hendrix" <dmhendri AT FEDEX DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:36:24 -0600; Is anyone using 3590s attached to the host via FC? Thanks, David Hendrix dmhendri AT fedex DOT com; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-03/msg01506.html (10,727 bytes)
2. Re: 3590 Fibre Channel (score: 1): Author: "Burton, Robert" <ROBERT.BURTON AT ROYALBANK DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:39:05 -0500; 3590 does not support FC yet.... Robert Burton Open Systems Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada (416) 348-3849 Robert.Burton AT RoyalBank DOT com; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-03/msg01508.html (10,842 bytes)
3. 3590 Fibre Channel (score: 1): Author: David M. Hendrix [mailto:dmhendri AT FEDEX DOT COM]; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:32:30 -0500; Is anyone using 3590s attached to the host via FC? Thanks, David Hendrix dmhendri AT fedex DOT com; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-03/msg01509.html (10,791 bytes)
4. Re: 3590 Fibre Channel (score: 1): Author: "David M. Hendrix" <dmhendri AT FEDEX DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:40:27 -0600; Okay, let's clarify. 3590 through some sort of FC/SCSI bridge. 3590 does not have a native FC interface yet so it was assumed this config would be used. David "Burton, Robert" <ROBERT.BURTON AT ROYAL; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-03/msg01514.html (11,331 bytes)
5. Re: 3590 Fibre Channel (score: 1): Author: "Joshua S. Bassi" <jbassi AT GLORYWORKS DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:16:47 -0800; David You are correct, 3590s are Fibre Channel supported through the IBM SAN Data Gateway (OEMed from Pathlight I think it was). I have sent out a couple of SAN proposals to for a couple of customer; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-03/msg01525.html (11,151 bytes)
6. Re: 3590 Fibre Channel (score: 1): Author: "David M. Hendrix" <dmhendri AT FEDEX DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:54:56 -0600; Interesting. I did not know IBM was OEMing pathlight. I currently am testing with a Crossroads but hear the pathlights have better throughput. Since IBM will be reselling McData switches now, they sh; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-03/msg01529.html (11,743 bytes)
7. Re: 3590 Fibre Channel (score: 1): Author: Keith Nelson <knelson AT OPENMIC DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:25:52 -0600; We've got a customer in Switzerland that's got the following configuration working: 1) RS/6000 running AIX 4.3.3 - the application is Veritas 2) Emulex HBA #6227 from IBM 3) Connectivity through one; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-03/msg01548.html (13,395 bytes)
8. Re: 3590 Fibre Channel (score: 1): Author: Mark Owens <Mark_Owens AT PRODIGY DOT NET>; Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:25:30 -0500; Keith, Would you know if the customer is using 64 bit extensions with AIX 4.3.3. We testing a similar config but the 64 bit extensions forced us to use Cambex instead of Emulex. Emulex does not have; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-03/msg01578.html (14,296 bytes)
9. Re: 3590 Fibre Channel (score: 1): Author: Keith Nelson <knelson AT OPENMIC DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:46:08 -0600; I think we're still working on 64 bit version of the Emulex driver. As far a IBM not having support for "switched fabric and tape and their adapter", I'm not sure what you mean. Are you talking about; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-03/msg01585.html (15,811 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]