Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+Un\-numbered\s+Interfaces\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+Un\-numbered\s+Interfaces\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [nv-l] Un-numbered Interfaces. (score: 1): Author: "Brian Backer" <brian.backer AT centurytel DOT com>; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:49:48 -0500; I have question that I need some help with. I have a request from a customer to monitor some cisco "un-numbered" interfaces. I've only ever monitored IP and IPX interfaces. Anyone here monitoring un-; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-04/msg00275.html (11,622 bytes)
2. Re: [nv-l] Un-numbered Interfaces. (score: 1): Author: ray.smith AT clorox DOT com; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:03:17 -0700; there is an option in the serversetup gui for unnumbered ip address support. its under the heading of set options for daemons, then set options for topology , discovery, ... then set options for netm; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-04/msg00277.html (12,738 bytes)
3. RE: [nv-l] Un-numbered Interfaces. (score: 1): Author: "Brian Backer" <brian.backer AT centurytel DOT com>; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:30:14 -0500; thanks for the reply.. I hadn't, but I just went into there and it's set to "yes" However, when I rediscover a device, it doesn't show any interfaces that are un-numbered. What should I be expecting; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-04/msg00278.html (14,232 bytes)
4. RE: [nv-l] Un-numbered Interfaces. (score: 1): Author: Oliver Bruchhaeuser <oliver.bruchhaeuser AT de.ibm DOT com>; Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 09:48:12 +0200; to discover the unnumbered interfaces you have to discover both sides (Routers) of the unnumbered link. Oliver "Brian Backer" <brian.backer AT centurytel DOT com> Sent by: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-04/msg00281.html (15,355 bytes)
5. RE: [nv-l] Un-numbered Interfaces. (score: 1): Author: "Brian Backer" <brian.backer AT centurytel DOT com>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:07:04 -0500; Oliver, I have discovered both sides, but there is still no representation inside the router sub-map to show the interface.... should there / could there be? b --Original Message-- From: owner-nv-l A; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-04/msg00288.html (16,957 bytes)
6. RE: [nv-l] Un-numbered Interfaces. (score: 1): Author: "Laurie Gellatly" <laurie.gellatly AT netic DOT com>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:22:32 -0600; Has netmon discovered routes on both of the routers that point directly to an address on the other router across the un-numbered interface? I've had to create redundant routes just so the diagram wou; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-04/msg00294.html (14,686 bytes)
7. RE: [nv-l] Un-numbered Interfaces. (score: 1): Author: Oliver Bruchhaeuser <oliver.bruchhaeuser AT de.ibm DOT com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 07:41:27 +0200; unnumbered interfaces usually show up with ip address 0.0.0.0. On Cisco devices the unnumbered link is discovered from the CDP cache. On both sides the router of the other end has to be there. I'm no; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-04/msg00296.html (17,907 bytes)
8. RE: [nv-l] Un-numbered Interfaces. (score: 1): Author: "Brian Backer" <brian.backer AT centurytel DOT com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:32:58 -0500; Oliver, I'm using Netview 7.1 on Aix4.3.3 When I did the walk, I do see the neighbor, however, the hostname it shows doesn't resolve to a valid IP Address in our network. both routers are discovered,; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-04/msg00311.html (20,618 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]