Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+SNMP\s+monitoring\s+anomaly\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+SNMP\s+monitoring\s+anomaly\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [nv-l] SNMP monitoring anomaly (score: 1): Author: "Evans, Bill" <Bill.Evans AT hq.doe DOT gov>; Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:07:47 -0400; NV 7.1.3.0 on Solaris 2.8. Yes, I'm a bit behind. Our system has a number of firewalls which will only respond to a ping on the NetView facing interface. I do have ACLs set which will allow the NetVi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-06/msg00189.html (15,241 bytes)
2. RE: [nv-l] SNMP monitoring anomaly (score: 1): Author: "Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr AT csgsystems DOT com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:26:45 -0500; Bill, I remember discussing behavior like this with support - I think we ended up thinking it was a problem with NATing the NetView server. Are you NAT'd? If so, (and I can't remember the details) so; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-06/msg00192.html (16,492 bytes)
3. RE: [nv-l] SNMP monitoring anomaly (score: 1): Author: "Evans, Bill" <Bill.Evans AT hq.doe DOT gov>; Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:04:31 -0400; Possible, but our NetView is not NATed. I had the same problem today on the Routers of the enterprise and they don't get anywhere near NAT. For them I turned off the SNMP management and things starte; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-06/msg00196.html (21,435 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]