Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+Has\s+anyone\s+implemented\s+the\s+full\s+TEC\s+integration\s+\(correlation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+Has\s+anyone\s+implemented\s+the\s+full\s+TEC\s+integration\s+\(correlation\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [nv-l] Has anyone implemented the full TEC integration (correlation (score: 1): Author: Paul <pstroud AT bellsouth DOT net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:35:29 -0500; rules) NV 7.1.4 and TEC 3.9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Drew, I believe the intent was that cleanup.rls would come along and get rid of y; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-01/msg00222.html (11,151 bytes)
2. RE: [nv-l] Has anyone implemented the full TEC integration (correlation (score: 1): Author: "Van Order, Drew $US - Hermitage$" <dvanorder AT deloitte DOT com>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:16:22 -0600; That makes sense after looking at the rule in the TEC guide. Thanks for that--Drew --Original Message-- From: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com [mailto:owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com] On Behalf; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-01/msg00223.html (12,024 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]