Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+question\s+on\s+key\s+manager\s+for\s+IBM\s+lto\-4\s+tape\s+drives\s+and\s+Netbackup\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+question\s+on\s+key\s+manager\s+for\s+IBM\s+lto\-4\s+tape\s+drives\s+and\s+Netbackup\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] question on key manager for IBM lto-4 tape drives and Netbackup (score: 1): Author: Len Boyle <Len.Boyle AT sas DOT com>; Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:54:41 -0500; Good Day, We have a few IBM LTO-4 tape drives for which, we would like to start using the build in encryption support with Netbackup 6.5.3 Early reading seems to indicate that there are at least two; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-02/msg00105.html (11,708 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] question on key manager for IBM lto-4 tape drives and Netbackup (score: 1): Author: Travis Kelley <rhatguy AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:11:48 -0500; I've used the netbackup KMS and it does work fine, although its sort of a kluge right now in my opinion. Currently you are limited to 2 keychains and you must use media from a policy whose name begin; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-02/msg00109.html (13,305 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] question on key manager for IBM lto-4 tape drives and Netbackup (score: 1): Author: Travis Kelley <rhatguy AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:31:46 -0500; I should have said you must use media from a VOLUME POOlL whose name begins with a prefix of ENCR_. -- Sent from my mobile device _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist -; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-02/msg00110.html (13,883 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]