Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Why\s+I\s+hate\s+NDMP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Why\s+I\s+hate\s+NDMP\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Why I hate NDMP (score: 1): Author: Pearson, Kim (STP) kim.pearson AT guidant DOT com; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:17:24 -0600; We actually have 2 NAS 760 filers - 1 for the UNIX team, 1 for NT. The UNIX team backs up the NAS using NFS mounts over the network (NetBackup). That is not painful. We get nice, indexed backups, can; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-01/msg00133.html (14,166 bytes)
2. [Veritas-bu] Why I hate NDMP (score: 1): Author: Brad Fisher P70142 p70142 AT email.mot DOT com; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:02:41 -0700; Well, I *am* new to Netbackup, but we have a similar setup going here and we're getting about 5mbs on full streaming backups using NDMP (760 filer to a STK9710) ... and I have fully indexed backups t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-01/msg00141.html (12,914 bytes)
3. [Veritas-bu] Why I hate NDMP (score: 1): Author: Chris Graves cmg AT bow.rsc.raytheon DOT com; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:20:31 -0800 (PST); We have a similar setup at our site, using 2 drives in an ATL P1000 directly connected to the NetApp 760, and a Sun box as the master server. We have indexed backups, short incrementals (cummulative); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-01/msg00142.html (15,800 bytes)
4. [Veritas-bu] Why I hate NDMP (score: 1): Author: Pearson, Kim (STP) kim.pearson AT guidant DOT com; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:26:52 -0600; Chris This NetApp is only running CIFS/NTFS. No NFS, so no option to use the "dump" restore feature. Also, the ACLs have to be considered, even if we did install NFS. That turns into a security night; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-01/msg00144.html (17,257 bytes)
5. [Veritas-bu] Why I hate NDMP (score: 1): Author: Pearson, Kim (STP) kim.pearson AT guidant DOT com; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:29:05 -0600; Curtis - Thanks. I didn't do a very good job of making my point about indexes. This came from a Network Appliance developer yesterday with regard to progress that's being made with Veritas on the "re; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-01/msg00146.html (15,646 bytes)
6. [Veritas-bu] Why I hate NDMP (score: 1): Author: W. Curtis Preston curtis AT backupcentral DOT com; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 06:46:25 -0800; If I may jump in, it's not that her backups are not indexed. I believe that it's that NetBackup is not yet using the features of the most recent versions of ONTAP. With a regular NetBackup image, Net; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-01/msg00149.html (14,424 bytes)
7. [Veritas-bu] Why I hate NDMP (score: 1): Author: Deron Johnson djohnson AT amgen DOT com; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:44:35 -0800; [...] But you can run the restore command on the filer. -- Deron Johnson djohnson AT amgen DOT com; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-01/msg00169.html (11,426 bytes)
8. [Veritas-bu] Why I hate NDMP (score: 1): Author: Curran Padake Curran.Padake AT nortel-dasa DOT de; Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:45:40 +0100; Hello everyone !, I am very new to Netbackup and have a few questions, at the end of the week we get the error message unable to allocate volume space for new media status code 96, however once we ha; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-01/msg00173.html (15,338 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]