Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+VTL\s+Recommendations\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] VTL Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: mitch808 <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:19:45 -0400
32TB of deduped data, that's post process, which could be closer to 100TB in original data size assuming average file types. Thats still a lot of data per media server. Use a PureDisk pool and you ca
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-10/msg00000.html (10,562 bytes)

2. [Veritas-bu] VTL Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: ccosta.ccc AT gmail DOT com
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:15:50 +0000
To all, I was hoping to get some feedback from the community on what type of VTL you guys use and if you would recommend looking into it. We currently have Copan and NetApp VTL. NetApp disbanded thei
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-09/msg00187.html (11,139 bytes)

3. Re: [Veritas-bu] VTL Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: <Rusty.Major AT sungard DOT com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:10:36 -0500
I would recommend moving away from the Virtual Tape Library and utilizing Advanced Disk, Disk Pools and Storage LifeCycle Policies. Most "VTLs" today can be utilized as a giant pool of disks, instead
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-09/msg00189.html (14,161 bytes)

4. Re: [Veritas-bu] VTL Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: "Marelas, Peter" <Peter.Marelas AT team.telstra DOT com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:45:18 +1000
The VTL interface has been superseded by OST based devices and NetBackup's own disk staging technologies. If I were to start again I would take a serious look at the disk and deduplication options av
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-09/msg00191.html (12,783 bytes)

5. [Veritas-bu] VTL Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: mitch808 <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:24:59 -0400
As others mentioned, just step away from VTL's in general. All they are, are disk as the base, with software on top, emulating tape, with a big markup for that software. Just buy plain disk, or re-us
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-09/msg00206.html (11,655 bytes)

6. Re: [Veritas-bu] VTL Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: neil conner <neil AT mbari DOT org>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:59:17 -0700
One use for VTLs are NDMP backups, which can be written directly and thus bypass the media server. You can send NDMP backups to an OST device, but not without going through a media server first. Depe
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-09/msg00221.html (12,575 bytes)

7. [Veritas-bu] VTL Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: mitch808 <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:17:58 -0400
Neil, True for the likes of say Quantum you can NDMP direct to tape, and that is a cool feature. I however dont see much issue going through a media server these days as fast as media servers are, an
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-09/msg00222.html (11,418 bytes)

8. Re: [Veritas-bu] VTL Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: A Darren Dunham <ddunham AT taos DOT com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:31:57 +0000
But there can be a big price difference. For a VM environment, I'm getting rather good compression. I would have to pay more just for the NBU deduplication licensing (before purchasing the disk) than
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-09/msg00235.html (11,933 bytes)

9. Re: [Veritas-bu] VTL Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: <judy_hinchcliffe AT administaff DOT com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:57:03 +0000
Remember that NB built in dedup has a size limit. For NetBackup 7.0, the maximum deduplication capacity is 32 TBs. --Original Message-- From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-09/msg00236.html (12,908 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu