Author: "Jeff Lightner" <jlightner AT water DOT com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:08:28 -0400
The fact is based on this forum there ARE issues with 6.5.2. The tech you get at Symantec may or may not be familiar with the specific problem you're having and may or may not stumble across the bina
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Jeff Lightner <jlightner AT water DOT com> wrote: I for one am a little over the posts suggesting that bad releases like 6.0 before a late MP and 6.5.2 aren't really
Author: "Jeff Lightner" <jlightner AT water DOT com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:00:02 -0400
Telling folks to “get over it” is just cheerleading to me. From: Ed Wilts [mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 1:48 PM To: Jeff Lightner Cc: Jorge Fábregas;
And of course you ignored what I said about not always being able to get someone at Symantec to tell you what those "few patches" are or correctly identify that you need them. I didn't ignore it but
Author: tburrell <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:00:54 -0400
No, no, don't do that, don't do that. If you shoot him, you'll just make him mad. -Gene Wilder, "Blazing Saddles" +-- +-- _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas
Author: "Deiter, Scott" <scottd AT HanoverDirect DOT com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 12:44:11 -0400
Despite all the errors we are moving "forward" with version 6.5.2.a across the enterprise. the latest headache is the use of window 2008 standard edition as a media server with quantum sdlt 600 tape
_______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu